What would you have to believe?

I used to work with a very smart guy who had a talent for distilling complicated problems. A framework he often used was: What would you have to believe? (At this point he would stride purposefully towards a whiteboard, pen in hand).

It is pretty flexible, and works forwards and backwards (understanding the past, trying to anticipate the future).

I have often come back to it, so much so that a) I did that terrible business thing of making it an acronym (WWYHTB) and b) I forgot that it was not a widely known acronym, and used it somewhere other than my notebook scribblings. Needless to say I was met with confusion; there is something slightly embarrassing about explaining a string of random letters you just made up, as if the reader should have naturally inferred its meaning.

So I suppose I would like to future-proof myself against a similar mistake by documenting it here on the internet. WWYHTB for this to catch on?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s